Who Holds the AI Answers in Dubai: Nobody Does
We counted every source the engine cited across our 62-query panel: 301 citations spread over 178 different domains, 131 of them cited exactly once. The biggest single source is LinkedIn at 6%. No competitor holds this category, and that changes where the budget goes.
By Firoz Azees · Published · 6 min read
The assumption underneath most AI-visibility spending is that you are competing with a handful of rival websites for the answer. We measured it on our own panel and that is not the shape of this category at all. There is no incumbent to displace. There is a crowd.
The short version
Across our 62-query panel, run through Google AI Mode on 16 and 18 September 2026, the engine cited 301 sources drawn from 178 different domains. One hundred and thirty-one of those domains were cited exactly once. The largest single source in the entire panel is LinkedIn, at 6% of citations. YouTube, LinkedIn, Reddit and Quora together hold 54 of the 301 citations — 18%, the biggest bloc by some distance, and they appear in 27 of the 56 answers that cited anything at all. UAE domains hold 10%. Our own domain holds 1.7%. No rival agency domain exceeds 2%.
What we counted
| Source class | Share of 301 citations | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms (YouTube, LinkedIn, Reddit, Quora) | 18%, and present in 27 of 56 answers | Participation, not optimisation |
| UAE domains (.ae) | 10% | The local field, fragmented |
| Our own domain | 1.7% | Protect and extend |
| Everything else — a long tail | 70%, across 178 domains | 131 domains cited exactly once |
The method is the one behind every number on this site: we ran real buyer questions through Google AI Mode and saved every answer and source list as a dated receipt. Our receipts are the input to the figures above. Counts are domain-level, and both figures above are recomputed from those receipts by a check that refuses any published number it cannot reproduce.
A correction, because the alternative is worse. An earlier version of this research circulated internally as "platforms hold 57% of citations", and a later reading was published on this site as "49% of citations". Both were wrong in the same way: that is roughly the share of answers citing a platform somewhere, not the share of citations sitting on one. The citation share is 18%. The answer-level figure, about half of all answers touching a platform, is the real and still-striking finding. We corrected it here rather than leave the more dramatic number up.
Why the tail is so long in a young category
The category's own content is thin
Dubai AEO is new enough that few sites have deep coverage. The engine reaches for whatever answers the question, which is why a detailed Reddit reply frequently beats a service page that only sells.
Platforms carry the discussion format
Buyer questions in this space are comparative and sceptical. Forums and video answer in that register natively; a service page does not. That is why platforms are the largest bloc even while no single one dominates.
The engine trusts corroboration over assertion
A vendor page claiming excellence and a thread of practitioners arguing about vendors are different evidence types. One is a claim; the other reads as independent corroboration.
What this changes about budget
- Split your target questions before spending. For each, read the source list and mark it on-domain-winnable or held elsewhere. Fund them differently.
- Stop buying on-domain work for answers assembled from platforms. No page you publish reaches an answer built from a Reddit thread and a YouTube video.
- Fund participation as a line item. Answering the specific threads the engine quotes is reachable, and almost nobody staffs it.
- Treat the long tail as pitchable. Seventy per cent of citations sit on domains that are not platforms and not competitors — publications, tool blogs, roundups. Those accept contributions.
- Do not fear the competitor you were worried about. No rival agency domain held more than 2% of citations. You are not being beaten by one site; you are absent from a crowd.
This is what AI Search Visibility actually looks like when you measure it rather than buy a score for it. The citation count is a retrieval fact, not a ranking; treating it as a leaderboard is measuring the wrong thing. And because most of the sources sit somewhere you do not own, the work is the away game before it is an on-site project.
The uncomfortable part for agencies
An AEO retainer that touches only your website is structurally capped at the share of answers your own domain can reach. That is not a criticism of the work — passage structure genuinely moves retrieval, as the Princeton GEO research1 measured at up to 40% under controlled conditions. It is a statement about reach. Ask any agency what proportion of your target answers are held off your domain before you sign, and see whether they have counted at all.
Questions
Is this split stable?
Should I make YouTube videos then?
Does posting on Reddit work?
Why is your own share only 1.7%?
Do these shares differ by industry?
How do I count this for my own market?
What if my competitor is in the tail?
About the author
Firoz Azees, founder of Ivanooo. Fifteen years running growth for companies in Dubai, Singapore, London and Silicon Valley. Runs a 62-question AI answer panel and publishes what it measures.
Sources
- Princeton GEO research (arxiv.org) · primary source
First published 22 Sept 2026.
Find out if AI can tell you apart.
A free read of how interchangeable your pages are with your competitors', with the answers captured. Get your free growth audit